@article {1971416,
	title = {Counteracting Globalization{\textquoteright}s Skeptics: How Diasporas Influence the Internationalization Preferences of Minority Entrepreneurs{\textquoteright} Firms},
	journal = {Global Strategy Journal},
	year = {2019},
	month = {2019},
	keywords = {Strategy \& Entrepreneurship},
	author = {Inouye,Todd M and Joshi,Amol and Hemmatian,Iman and Robinson,Jeffrey A}
}
@inbook {1972066,
	title = {Urban Innovation:  At the nexus of entrepreneurship and urban policy},
	year = {2019},
	month = {2019},
	pages = {129-144},
	address = {Cheltenham, UK},
	abstract = {We define urban innovation as the development of long-lasting transformations in urban communities, neighborhoods, and cities. In our proposed framework, urban innovation is driven by two overarching principles: social inclusion and transformation. Inclusion allows for interaction across social groups and benefits society by reducing socio-economic separation through fostering stronger, and even new, relationships in the community. Transformation means deep-seated change that remodels the mindset and creates new change agents. These principles enable us to isolate innovative activities that are small and incremental, from urban innovations that have the potential to impact the economy and society in major ways. We identify three distinct types of transformative and inclusive policy innovations used in the urban innovation context: market creating, market integration, and market incentivizing. We also present three types of business model innovations that work within these innovations: social entrepreneurship, technology and innovation parks, and venture accelerators. We further categorize the social entrepreneurship business model into sustainable or triple bottom line businesses, social enterprises, micro-finance organizations and benefits corporations/B-Corps. We highlight specific examples of these policy and business model innovations from around the world to illustrate how and why urban innovations are essential for economic growth and social development in rapidly urbanizing cities. We also present several promising avenues for new research on urban innovation to guide scholars, practitioners, and policymakers in more systematically studying the phenomenon and in making strategic decisions about critical issues related to future of the world{\textquoteright}s cities.},
	keywords = {Strategy \& Entrepreneurship},
	isbn = {978 1 78643 600 9},
	author = {Robinson,Jeffrey A and Joshi,Amol and Vickerie-Dearman,Lutisha and Inouye,Todd M}
}
@article {1979406,
	title = {Glass Ceiling Effects for Minority and Women Technology Entrepreneurs},
	year = {2017},
	month = {2017},
	address = {Newark, NJ},
	keywords = {Strategy \& Entrepreneurship},
	author = {Joshi,Amol and Inouye,Todd M and Robinson,Jeffrey A}
}
@article {1972076,
	title = {How does agency workforce diversity influence Federal R\&D funding of minority and women technology entrepreneurs? An analysis of the SBIR and STTR programs, 20012011},
	journal = {Small Business Economics},
	volume = {50},
	year = {2017},
	month = {2017},
	pages = {499-519 (Winner of the Best Paper Prize for the Special Issue on Minority Entrepreneurship)},
	abstract = {U.S. Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs provide Federal research and development (R\&D) grants to technology ventures. We explore how grantor demographic diversity explains why demographically diverse grantees experience different odds for successfully transitioning from initial to follow-on R\&D grants. We empirically analyze 52,126 Phase I SBIR/STTR awards granted by 11 Federal agencies (2001-2011). We find a positive association between agency workforce diversity and Phase II funding for Phase I grantees, but minority and women technology entrepreneurs are less likely to receive this funding than their non-minority and male counterparts. Agencies valuing workforce ethnic diversity or leveraging gender homophily positively influence the likelihood of women technology entrepreneurs obtaining Phase II funding. We discuss evidence-based implications for policy and practice.},
	keywords = {Strategy \& Entrepreneurship},
	author = {Joshi,Amol and Inouye,Todd M and Robinson,Jeffrey A}
}
