@article {1974991,
	title = {As in-person classes resume, colleges shouldn{\textquoteright}t lose steam on faculty training},
	year = {2021},
	month = {2021},
	abstract = {Professional development in pedagogy should be required when instructors enter the institution and at intervals after that, one dean of teaching and learning explains.},
	keywords = {Business Law},
	url = {https://www.highereddive.com/news/as-in-person-classes-resume-colleges-shouldnt-lose-steam-on-faculty-train/598129/},
	author = {Scott,Inara}
}
@conference {1968831,
	title = {American Consumers{\textquoteright} Understandings of the Right to Consume Firearms},
	booktitle = {Consumer Culture Theory Consortium},
	year = {2019},
	month = {2019},
	keywords = {Business Law, Marketing},
	author = {Barnhart,Michelle and Huff,Aimee and Scott,Inara}
}
@article {1976271,
	title = {American Consumers{\textquoteright} Understandings of the Right to Consume Firearms},
	year = {2019},
	month = {2019},
	address = {Montreal, Canada},
	keywords = {Business Law, Marketing},
	author = {Barnhart,Michelle and Huff,Aimee and Scott,Inara}
}
@article {1975861,
	title = {An adaptive management model: A beyond budgeting informed approach},
	year = {2016},
	month = {2016},
	address = {Melbourne, Australia},
	keywords = {Accounting, Business Law},
	author = {Akroyd,Chris and O{\textquoteright}Grady,Winnie and Scott,Inara}
}
@article {1975076,
	title = {Antitrust and Socially Responsible Collaboration: A Chilling Combination?},
	journal = {American Business Law Journal},
	volume = {53},
	year = {2016},
	month = {2016},
	pages = {97-144},
	address = {Malden, MA},
	abstract = {Businesses are increasingly using collaboration to address concerns about sustainability, transparency, human rights, and labor conditions in global markets. Such collaborations include the development of certifications and standards, the sharing of information about factories and suppliers, and agreements to share facilities, like less than full delivery trucks. Yet at the same time, federal antitrust policies broadly prohibit agreements that restrain trade or commerce, creating the potential for innovative collaborations to result in legal prosecution. This article applies antitrust law to socially responsible and sustainable business collaboration in an effort to determine whether antitrust law chills potentially beneficial agreements. The article concludes that careful structuring of agreements can avoid many antitrust violations, but also finds that certain types of agreements, including those that could have the most impact on scarce resources and vulnerable commodity producers, are forbidden. Accordingly, this article argues that per se rules forbidding certain practices, including price fixing and resource sharing, be reconsidered in light of current economic and environmental conditions. It also questions certain assumptions about the benefits of competition in light of current environmental, human rights, and sustainability challenges.},
	keywords = {Business Law},
	url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ablj.12073/abstract},
	author = {Scott,Inara}
}
@article {1983101,
	title = {Antitrust and Socially Responsible Collaboration: A Chilling Combination?},
	year = {2015},
	month = {2015},
	address = {Philadelphia},
	keywords = {Business Law},
	author = {Scott,Inara}
}
@article {1975086,
	title = {Applying Stakeholder Theory to Utility Regulation},
	journal = {Ecology Law Currents},
	volume = {42},
	year = {2015},
	month = {2015},
	address = {Berkeley, CA},
	abstract = {Many in the energy sector are calling for a transformation of the traditional utility model. However, proposals for {\textquotedblleft}Utility 2.0{\textquotedblright} typically maintain the bilateral, adversarial relationship between the utility and its regulator. This article posits that one of the key flaws in the U.S. utility regulatory system is this myopic decision-making process, which limits the potential for consideration of stakeholder interests and more comprehensive systems thinking. While expanding the interests considered by utilities and regulators will not solve other problems embedded in traditional utility regulation, a broadening of the consideration of stakeholder interests will almost certainly allow for more comprehensive long-term planning, greater attention to environmental and other stakeholder concerns, and the potential for transformational policy choices. The article therefore offers a new governance structure that would bring stakeholder interests to the regulatory table and allow utilities and regulators to include these interests in key decision-making contexts.},
	keywords = {Business Law},
	url = {http://elq.typepad.com/currents/2015/01/applying-stakeholder-theory-to-utility-regulation.html},
	author = {Scott,Inara}
}
