@article {1970431,
	title = {Balancing Natural Environmental Concerns of the Internal and External Stakeholders in Family and Non-family Businesses},
	journal = {Journal of Family Business Strategy},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2012},
	month = {2012},
	pages = {28-37},
	abstract = {While researches have long suggested that firms must be attentive to their key stakeholders, the question of how attention to different stakeholders may have different benefits for different firms has not been well addressed. This is especially true in the case of family businesses, which confront a unique set of stakeholder challenges, and socioemotional goals not confronted by non-family firms. In this study, we investigate the effect of these competing demands across these different types of firms. We argue that while being attentive to both internal and external stakeholders is important to firm performance in family and non-family firms, family firms can benefit more when they match their concern for natural environmental stakeholders with a demonstration of concern for their employees. By effectively leveraging the power of these critical internal stakeholders, family firms can gain competitive advantages over non-family firms as it is through these internal stakeholders which the demands of external stakeholder are often met.},
	keywords = {Management, Strategy \& Entrepreneurship},
	author = {Neubaum,Donald and Dibrell,Clay and Craig,Justin}
}
@article {1970666,
	title = {Business Education and Its Relationship to Student Personal Moral Philosophies and Attitudes Toward Profits: An Empirical Response to Critics},
	journal = {Academy of Management Learning and Education},
	volume = {8},
	year = {2009},
	month = {2009},
	pages = {9-24},
	abstract = {Critics of business education (e.g., Ghoshal, 2005; Mitroff, 2004) place much of the blame for recent ethical scandals on the lack of moral development of managers and the amoral, "profits-first" theoretical underpinnings of business education. To empirically test these claims, we surveyed 1,080 business and nonbusiness students from a major research university. The results suggest that neither the personal moral philosophies of business and nonbusiness students, nor the personal moral philosophies of business freshmen and business seniors differed significantly. Based on our results, we found no evidence to support the claims of critics who suggest business education is associated with negative personal moral philosophies of students. Further, the attitudes of business freshmen and business seniors concerning profit and sustainability differed significantly, yet in the direction opposite the one Ghoshal (2005) and others would have predicted. Thus, blaming the rash of ethical scandals on the amoral and "profits-first" theoretical underpinnings of business school training might be too simplistic of an approach.},
	keywords = {Management, Strategy \& Entrepreneurship},
	author = {Neubaum,Donald and Pagell,Mark and Drexler,John and Ryan,Fran McKee and Larson,Erik}
}
@article {1977786,
	title = {Business education, personal moral philosophies and {\textquotedblleft}profits-first{\textquotedblright} mentalities: An empirical response to critics},
	year = {2006},
	month = {2006},
	address = {Altanta, GA},
	keywords = {Management, Strategy \& Entrepreneurship},
	author = {Neubaum,Donald and Drexler,John and Larson,Erik and Pagell,Mark and McKee-Ryan,Fran}
}
