00643nas a2200145   4500008004100000245013800041210006900179260000900248653003200257100002000289700001600309700002000325700002500345856012700370       2019                        eng d00aCounteracting Globalization's Skeptics: How Diasporas Influence the Internationalization Preferences of Minority Entrepreneurs' Firms0 aCounteracting Globalizations Skeptics How Diasporas Influence th  c201910aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aInouye, Todd, M1 aJoshi, Amol1 aHemmatian, Iman1 aRobinson, Jeffrey, A  uhttps://business.oregonstate.edu/biblio/counteracting-globalizations-skeptics-how-diasporas-influence-internationalization02431nas a2200157   4500008004100000245012400041210006900165260000900234300001400243490000700257520180800264653003202072100001602104700002002120856013302140       2018                        eng d00aHow do legal surprises drive organizational attention and case resolution? An analysis of false patent marking lawsuits0 aHow do legal surprises drive organizational attention and case r  c2018  a1741-17610 v473 aLegal surprises are unexpected suits or actions in which plaintiffs rely on claims or precedents that may be obscure, unfamiliar, or unknown to the defendants. Our study explores false patent marking suits, a unique type of patent-related legal surprise involving allegations of defendants marking products with ineligible patent numbers to deceive customers and/or deter competitors. An abrupt shift in U.S. Federal Courts’ interpretation of intellectual property rights (IPRs) policy amplified plaintiff incentives for filing these suits while escalating defendant penalties for proven violations. Handling costly legal surprises such as false patent marking suits requires focused attention from managers. Our core premise is that temporal and evidential cues in the timelines and storylines of plaintiffs’ legal narratives in surprise suits attract defendants’ organizational attention. We hypothesize about temporal focus (past, present, and future) and evidentiary reasoning (relevance, credibility, and inferential power) as attention cues and possible predictors of the mode (litigation or negotiation) and timing of case resolution. We apply automated content analysis to official court records for 992 false patent marking cases (2009-2011) and quantify competing risks using hazard models. We find that differences in temporal focus and evidentiary reasoning in the legal narratives of surprise suits are significant predictors of case resolution mode and timing. We also find that defendants countersuing to redirect plaintiffs’ attention is an effective negotiating tactic. We discuss the economic significance and strategic implications of our empirical findings on legal surprises, attention, case resolution mode and timing, and the unintended consequences of IPR policy changes.10aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aJoshi, Amol1 aHemmatian, Iman  uhttps://business.oregonstate.edu/biblio/how-do-legal-surprises-drive-organizational-attention-and-case-resolution-analysis-false00661nas a2200157   4500008004100000245011700041210006900158260002200227653003200249100002200281700001800303700001600321700002000337700001600357856013000373       2017                        eng d00aThe Impact of Bankruptcy on Competitors: How Technology Overlap and Diversification Affect Value Redistribution.0 aImpact of Bankruptcy on Competitors How Technology Overlap and D  aAtlanta, GAc201710aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aArthurs, Jonathan1 aCho, Sam, Yul1 aChoi, Yohan1 aHemmatian, Iman1 aJoshi, Amol  uhttps://business.oregonstate.edu/biblio/impact-bankruptcy-competitors-how-technology-overlap-and-diversification-affect-value01576nas a2200169   4500008004100000245010200041210006900143260000900212520092600221653003201147100002201179700001801201700001601219700002001235700001601255856013501271       2017                        eng d00aImpact of Bankruptcy on Rivals: How Tech Overlap and Diversification Affects Value Redistribution0 aImpact of Bankruptcy on Rivals How Tech Overlap and Diversificat  c20173 aPrior research on bankruptcy proposes two potential outcomes for a bankrupt firm’s industry rivals: a contagion effect wherein rivals’ stock prices decline, and a competitive effect wherein rivals benefit from a competitor’s decline. Although empirical evidence substantiates the contagion effect, existing studies do not consistently account for the competitive effect. We develop and test theory explaining how the degree of technology overlap and diversification strategy of competitors influences the severity of the contagion effect and the expected occurrence of the competitive effect among rivals. We find that greater technology overlap among a bankrupt firm and its competitors exacerbates the contagion effect. Furthermore, competitors with higher unrelated diversification are more susceptible to contagion, while competitors with higher related diversification benefit more from a rival’s bankruptcy.10aStrategy & Entrepreneurship1 aArthurs, Jonathan1 aCho, Sam, Yul1 aChoi, Yohan1 aHemmatian, Iman1 aJoshi, Amol  uhttps://business.oregonstate.edu/biblio/impact-bankruptcy-rivals-how-tech-overlap-and-diversification-affects-value-redistribution