02071nas a2200169   4500008004100000245009600041210006900137260000900206520145800215653001501673100001601688700002101704700001901725700002001744700002201764856011501786       2019                        eng d00aOn the treatment of people with disabilities in organizations: A review and research agenda0 atreatment of people with disabilities in organizations A review   c20193 aHuman resource practitioners have a crucial role in promoting equitable treatment of persons with disabilities, and practitioner’s decisions should be guided by solid evidence-based research. We offer a systematic review of the empirical research on the treatment of persons with disabilities in organizations, using Stone and Colella’s (1996) seminal theoretical model of the factors influencing the treatment of persons with disabilities in work organizations, to ask: What does the available research reveal about workplace treatment of persons with disabilities, and what remains understudied? Our review of 88 empirical studies from management, rehabilitation, psychology, and sociology research highlights seven gaps and limitations in extant research: (1) implicit definitions of workplace treatment, (2) neglect of national context variation, (3) missing differentiation between disability populations, (4) over-reliance on available data sets, (5) predominance of single-source, cross-sectional data (6) neglect of individual differences and identities in the presence of disability, and (7) lack of specificity on underlying stigma processes. To support the development of more inclusive workplaces, we recommend increased research collaborations between human resource researchers and practitioners on the study of specific disabilities and contexts, and efforts to define and expand notions of treatment to capture more nuanced outcomes.10aManagement1 aBeatty, Joy1 aBaldridge, David1 aBöhm, Stephan1 aKulkarni, Mukta1 aColella, Adrienna  uhttps://business.oregonstate.edu/biblio/treatment-people-disabilities-organizations-review-and-research-agenda02348nas a2200157   4500008004100000245026000041210006900301260002000370520157500390653001501965100002101980700001602001700001902017700001602036856013802052       2018                        eng d00aPeople with disabilities:  Identity, stigmatization, accommodation, and intersection with gender and aging effects on employment opportunities. In Bendl, R., Bleijenbergh, I., Henttonen, E., & Mills, A. J., The Oxford Handbook of Diversity in Organisation0 aPeople with disabilities Identity stigmatization accommodation a  aOxford UKc20183 aDisability status continues to have a significant negative impact on employment outcomes, even in countries with nondiscrimination policies, and outcomes differ by gender and age.  These subpar outcomes can be linked to both environmental and psychological factors.  The design of jobs and workplaces often limits the ability of workers with disabilities to contribute to their fullest capacity.  Stigmatization on the basis of disability status reduces employer willingness to hire workers with disabilities and make reasonable accommodations to allow them to perform effectively.  Some research indicates that women, older workers and workers with disabilities tend to be labeled as unwilling or unable to perform in demanding paid work roles.  Age intersects with disability resulting in inappropriate attribution of disability status as “normal aging.”  Gender intersects with disability to result in lower labor force participation for women with disabilities compared to their male counterparts.  Exclusion and stigmatization create barriers to the development of a positive self-identity as a person with a disability, but such identity development can be empowering, creating a sense of pride and providing a basis for advocacy.  Considerably more research is needed to understand how the actions of organizations, leaders, and teams affect the employment outcomes of workers with disabilities and how impacts differ by gender and age.  But based upon extant knowledge, there are many actions employers can take to improve outcomes for this group of workers.10aManagement1 aBaldridge, David1 aBeatty, Joy1 aKonrad, Alison1 aMoore, Mark  uhttps://business.oregonstate.edu/biblio/people-disabilities-identity-stigmatization-accommodation-and-intersection-gender-and-aging-000720nas a2200241   4500008004100000245004800041210004800089260002100137653001500158100001600173700002200189700002200211700002100233700002000254700001500274700001900289700001900308700001300327700001600340700001800356700001600374856008800390       2017                        eng d00aBuilding GDO community through storytelling0 aBuilding GDO community through storytelling  aAtlanta GAc201710aManagement1 aBeatty, Joy1 aIV, Oscar, Holmes1 aAtewologun, Doyin1 aBaldridge, David1 aBlancero, Donna1 aKing, Eden1 aKravitz, David1 aMcKay, Patrick1 aNg, Eddy1 aNishi, Lisa1 aRagins, Belle1 aWood, Geoff  uhttps://business.oregonstate.edu/biblio/building-gdo-community-through-storytelling01443nas a2200169   4500008004100000245003200041210003000073260001900103520097900122653001501101100002101116700001601137700001901153700002001172700001601192856006501208       2015                        eng d00aPersons with (dis)Abilities0 aPersons with disAbilities  aNew Yorkc20153 aThis chapter examines workplace discrimination faced by persons with (dis)abilities. It begins by discussing usage, meaning, and effects of the word “disability” and the related term “persons with disabilities.” It then considers the diversity of conditions and experiences among persons with (dis)abilities by reviewing extant research on people with five common disabling conditions (i.e., mobility, seeing, hearing, chronic illness, and psychiatric conditions). It also examines the importance of national context by taking a closer look at research on the experiences of people with (dis)abilities in five nations (i.e., United States, Canada, Germany, India, and China). By separately highlighting extant research on a few common conditions and nations, the chapter’s intent is to show the need for more research on specific conditions in specific work and national contexts, as well as the need for research integrating and summarizing these focused studies.10aManagement1 aBaldridge, David1 aBeatty, Joy1 aBöhm, Stephan1 aKulkarni, Mukta1 aMoore, Mark  uhttps://business.oregonstate.edu/biblio/persons-disabilities