TY - CONF T1 - Do Measures of Security Compliance Intent Equal Non-Compliance Scenario Agreement? T2 - WISP2022: 2022 Workshop on Information Security and Privacy (WISP) Y1 - 2022 A1 - Marshall,Byron A1 - Shadbad,Forough A1 - Curry,Michael A1 - Biros,David KW - Accounting KW - BIS AB - To better protect organizations from the threat of insiders, IS security (ISS) research frequently emphasizes IS Security Policy (ISP) behavior. The effectiveness of an assessment model is typically analyzed either using short survey statements (behavior survey) or by using scenario agreement (prospective scenario) to measure current and prospective compliance (or non-compliance) behavior. However, a significant gap is the lack of statistical evidence to demonstrate that these two measures or dependent variables (DV) sufficiently agree with one another. We report on an effort to compare and contrast two assessment models which employed alternate styles of DVs and demonstrate that the primary construct from two different ISS behavioral theories had approximately the same effect size on either of the DVs. Our findings add support for substantial (but not overly correlated) synchronization between the two DV values, since we also observe that the prospective scenario non-compliance measure resulted in lower model fit while the behavior survey compliance measures fit both models with higher accuracy. We discuss our findings and recommend that for many studies there can be value in employing both DVs. JA - WISP2022: 2022 Workshop on Information Security and Privacy (WISP) CY - Copenhagen, Denmark, Dec. 2022 UR - https://aisel.aisnet.org/wisp2022/19 U2 - b U4 - 245830387712 ID - 245830387712 ER - TY - CONF T1 - Do Measures of Security Compliance Intent Equal Non-Compliance Scenario Agreement? T2 - WISP2022: 2022 Workshop on Information Security and Privacy (WISP) Y1 - 2022 A1 - Marshall,Byron A1 - Shadbad,Forough A1 - Curry,Michael A1 - Biros,David KW - Accounting KW - BIS AB - To better protect organizations from the threat of insiders, IS security (ISS) research frequently emphasizes IS Security Policy (ISP) behavior. The effectiveness of an assessment model is typically analyzed either using short survey statements (behavior survey) or by using scenario agreement (prospective scenario) to measure current and prospective compliance (or non-compliance) behavior. However, a significant gap is the lack of statistical evidence to demonstrate that these two measures or dependent variables (DV) sufficiently agree with one another. We report on an effort to compare and contrast two assessment models which employed alternate styles of DVs and demonstrate that the primary construct from two different ISS behavioral theories had approximately the same effect size on either of the DVs. Our findings add support for substantial (but not overly correlated) synchronization between the two DV values, since we also observe that the prospective scenario non-compliance measure resulted in lower model fit while the behavior survey compliance measures fit both models with higher accuracy. We discuss our findings and recommend that for many studies there can be value in employing both DVs. JA - WISP2022: 2022 Workshop on Information Security and Privacy (WISP) CY - Copenhagen, Denmark, Dec. 2022 U2 - b U4 - 245830387712 ID - 245830387712 ER - TY - HEAR T1 - Disentangling IT Artifact Bias Y1 - 2012 A1 - Curry,Michael A1 - Marshall,Byron KW - Accounting KW - BIS JA - 4th Annual Pre-ICIS Workshop on Accounting Information Systems CY - Orlando, Florida U2 - c U4 - 69567012864 ID - 69567012864 ER - TY - CONF T1 - Does Using CobiT Improve IT Solution Proposals? T2 - AAA Annual Meeting, IS Section Y1 - 2010 A1 - Marshall,Byron A1 - Curry,Michael A1 - Reitsma,Reindert KW - Accounting KW - BIS AB - The CobiT (Control Objectives for Information and related Technology) framework is designed to help organizations implement IT governance practices by systematically shaping identifiable IT processes to better leverage IT expenditures. The control structure advocated in CobiT embodies governance notions including business alignment, a risk/control perspective, systematic measurement, accountability, and continuous improvement. Despite the rise of internal control regulation, not all organizations have implemented systematic IT controls and many, notably small, organizations may never do so. This study explores whether exposing decision makers to CobiT positively affects the IT solutions they generate. We present a framework (drawn primarily from the structure of CobiT) for identifying normatively better IT plans as measured by application of governance principles. We report on 115 IT solution proposals created by business students. The proposals developed using CobiT more frequently took a risk/control approach, addressed the need for continuous improvement, referred to general IT processes, identified the people who should implement a solution, and proposed more measures of success. Thus, exposing decision makers to a systematic IT governance framework promises to help them generate more comprehensive solutions to IT challenges. JA - AAA Annual Meeting, IS Section U2 - b U4 - 16758226945 ID - 16758226945 ER - TY - CONF T1 - Delivering Value Beyond Efficiency with Visualized XBRL T2 - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2009) Y1 - 2009 A1 - Marshall,Byron A1 - Mortenson,Kristian A1 - Bourne,Amy A1 - Price,Kevin A1 - Marshall,Andrew KW - Accounting KW - BIS JA - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2009) CY - Phoenix, AZ U2 - b U4 - 16758251521 ID - 16758251521 ER - TY - CONF T1 - Dimensional Standard Alignment in K-12 Digital Libraries: Assessment of Self-found vs. Recommended Curriculum T2 - Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL'09), Austin, TX Y1 - 2009 A1 - Marshall,Byron A1 - Reitsma,Reindert A1 - Zarske,Malinda KW - Accounting KW - BIS JA - Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL'09), Austin, TX UR - http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1555400.1555403 U2 - b U4 - 12651069441 ID - 12651069441 ER -