%0 Journal Article %J Environmental Law Reporter %D 2019 %T Environmental Law. Disrupted. %A Scott,Inara %A Takacs,David %K Business Law %X The U.S. regulatory environment is changing rapidly, at the same time that visible and profound impacts of climate change are already being felt throughout the world, and enormous, potentially existential threats loom in the not-so-distant future. What does it mean to think about and practice environmental law in this setting? In this Article, members of the Environmental Law Collaborative have taken on the question of whether environmental law as we currently know it is up to the job of addressing these threats, and, if not, what the path forward should be. %B Environmental Law Reporter %C Washington, D.C. %V 49 %P 10038-10063 %8 2019 %G eng %U https://elr.info/news-analysis/49/10038/environmental-law-disrupted %N 1 %2 a %4 202780846080 %$ 202780846080 %0 Journal Article %J Environmental Law Reporter %D 2017 %T Energy Policy: No Place for Zero-Sum Thinking %A Scott,Inara %A Baker,Shalanda %A Craig,Robin Kundis %A Dernbach,John %A Hirokawa,Keith %A Krakoff,Sarah %A Owley,Jessica %A Powers,Melissa %A Roesler,Shannon %A Rosenbloom,Jonathan %A Ruhl,JB %A Salzman,Jim %A Takacs,David %K Business Law %X Environmental law and environmental protection are often portrayed as requiring trade offs: “jobs versus environment,” “markets versus regulation,” “enforcement versus incentives.” The authors explore the meaning and the role of zero-sum environmentalism as a first step in moving beyond it. %B Environmental Law Reporter %V 47 %P 10328-10351 %8 2017 %G eng %U https://elr.info/news-analysis/47/10328/beyond-zero-sum-environmentalism %N 4 %2 a %4 142464768000 %$ 142464768000