Professor
Management

Pauline Schilpzand

Overview
Overview
Publications

Overview

Biography

Dr. Pauline Schilpzand is the "Gomo Family Professor" of Management in the College of Business at Oregon State University and Program Lead for the Management and Organizational Leadership programs in the College of Business. Pauline received her Ph.D. in Management from the University of Florida.

Her primary research areas include effective leadership practices, when and why employees behave either proactively or counterproductively at work (e.g., engage in gossip or workplace incivility) along with the impacts of these behaviors in a work context. Her research has been published in leading organizational journals, including Academy of Management Journal, Organization Science, Journal of Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Personnel Psychology, Journal of Management, Human Resource Management, and Journal of Organizational Behavior. Pauline is a former Associate Editor at the Journal of Management (2020-2023), and served on the 4-year leadership track of the Managerial and Organizational (MOC) Division of the Academy of Management (2019-2023). She teaches negotiation courses in the College of Business at Oregon State University.

Credentials

Ph.D. in Management Studies, University of Florida, Warrington College of Business.

 

Honors and Awards:

  • Academy of Management Journal Best Paper Award, 2010.
  • Saroj Parasuraman Award for outstanding publication (presented by the gender and diversity in organizations division of the Academy of Management), 2011.
  • Excellence in Graduate Teaching Award 2014.
  • Western Academy of Management Ascendant Scholar Award, 2016.
  • Group and Organization Management Best Paper Award, 2024.
  • Excellence in Scholarship (Research) Award 2015 and 2024.

 

Selected Publications:

Yim, J., Klotz, A. C., Foulk, T. A., & Schilpzand, P. (2025). New research on how to get workplace rituals right. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2025/07/new-research-on-how-to-get-workplace-rituals-right

Yim, J., Foulk, T. A., Klotz, A. C., & Schilpzand, P. (2025). Is Everyone Having a Good Time? The Effects of Complex Organizational Rituals on Employee Engagement and Behavior. Journal of Management. In Press.

Lagios, C., Restubog, S. L. D., Schilpzand, P., Aquino, K., Lagios, N., & Caesens, G. (2025). Seeing the good in the bad: A self-affirmation model of organizational dehumanization. Journal of Applied Psychology. In Press.

Zettna, N., Nguyen, H., Restubog, S. L. D., Schilpzand, P., & Johnson, A. (2025). How teams can overcome silence: The roles of humble leadership and team commitment. Personnel Psychology, 78(1), 67-102.

Restubog, S. L., Li, Y., Schilpzand, P., He, Y., & Nerona, R. (2025). Leading with pride: An interdisciplinary integrative review on LGBTIQ+ leadership and an agenda for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 101, 883.

Schilpzand, P., Lagios, C., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2025). Family first: An integrative conceptual review of nepotism in organizations. Human Resource Management64(1), 157-180.

Sun, T., Schilpzand, P., Liu, Y. (2023). Workplace gossip: An integrative review of its antecedents, functions, and consequences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44 (2), 311-334

Cho, J., Schilpzand, P., Huang, L., & Paterson, T. (2021). How and When Humble Leadership Facilitates Employee Job Performance: The Roles of Feeling Trusted and Job Autonomy. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 28(2), 169-184.

Schilpzand, P. & Huang, L. (2018). When and How Experienced Incivility Dissuades Proactive Performance: An Integration of Sociometer and Self-Identity Orientation Perspectives, Journal of Applied Psychology, 103 (8), 828.

Schilpzand, P., Houston, L., & Cho, J. (2018). Not Too Tired to be Proactive: Daily Empowering Leadership Spurs Next-Morning Employee Proactivity as Moderated by Nightly Sleep Quality. Academy of Management Journal, 61 (6), 2367-2387.

Livingston, B. A, Schilpzand, P., & Erez, A. (2017). A. It’s not only what you say, it’s how you say it:  Accented messages and their effect on choice. Journal of Management. 43(3), 804-833.

Schilpzand, P., Leavitt, K., & Lim, S. (2016). Incivility hates company: shared victimization attenuates attribution-driven effects of rudeness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 133, 33-44.

Schilpzand, P., De Pater, I., & Erez, E. (2016). Workplace incivility: A review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, S57-S88.

Erez, A., Schilpzand, P., Leavitt, K., Woolum, A., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Inherently relational: Interactions between peers’ and individuals’ personalities impact credit giving and evaluations of individual performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1761-1784.

Schilpzand, P., Hekman, D, & Mitchell, T. R. (2015). Courage: The nature of the concept and its implications for organizations. Organization Science, 26(1), 52-77.

Leavitt, K., Reynolds, S., Barnes, C. Schilpzand, P., & Hannah. S. (2012). Different hats, different obligations: Plural occupational identities and situated moral judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1316-1333.

Hekman, D., Aquino, K., Owens, B., Mitchell, T., Schilpzand, P. & Leavitt, K. (2010). An examination of whether and how racial and gender biases influence customer satisfaction ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (2), 238-264.

 

Publications

Academic Journal
Management

“Heartsick for Home: An Integrative Review of Employee Homesickness and an Agenda for Future Research”

Homesickness is a common experience for employees who move for a job. We provide an integrative review of the literature on employee homesickness to offer four main contributions. First, we undertake a state-of-the-art review that integrates the disparate literature on homesickness, focusing on its antecedents, consequences, underlying mechanisms, and moderating influences. Second, we clarify the concept of homesickness and differentiate it from neighboring concepts to advance theory development and facilitate its measurement. Third, we integrate Conservation of Resources theory with the homesickness model to provide robust and parsimonious theoretical accounts relating homesickness to its antecedents and outcomes. Finally, we use this integrative framework to generate a promising agenda for future research, thus forging meaningful connections to other domains and stimulating theoretical and
Details
Academic Journal
Management

“Pride in the Workplace: An Integrative Review, Synthesis, and Future Research Agenda”

Research on the role of emotions in organizations has evolved into a major field of study over the past two decades, often referred to as the “Affective Revolution,” (e.g., Barsade, Brief, and Spataro 2003; Elfenbein 2007). Taking note, many scholars have investigated the emotion most proximally associated with workplace achievement, self-efficacy, status and rank, identity, and collective belonging: pride. Pride reflects satisfaction with one's achievements and identity, the achievements of others or groups with whom one is closely associated (e.g., an organization; Helm 2013), or the possession of attributes that are socially valued (Tracy and Robins 2004). Surprisingly, despite the abundant and rapidly growing literature on pride in a work context, a comprehensive review of the literature is notably absent. Our review integrates and distills the current state of the science across this vast and fragmented literature, spread over multiple content domains. We identify emergent themes, offer an integrated process framework of pride in a work context, help to resolve conflicting findings and ongoing debates in this literature, and provide a series of generative and theoretically grounded suggestions for meaningfully extending the literature on pride in a work context.
Details