Faculty Research

Search Publications

Recent Journal Publications by COB Faculty

Search Publications

Filter & Sort Results: 1221
[clear]
Publication Type Publication Type
Discipline Discipline
Year Published Year Published

Sort by

Showing results for: ""
Results:
Academic Journal
Strategy & Entrepreneurship

“Disentangling the influences of leaders' relational embeddedness on interorganizational exchange”

Drawing on the concept of relational embeddedness and the associated mechanisms of mutual understanding, trust, and commitment, we examine how leaders' prior exchange experiences influence the likelihood of subsequent interorganizational exchange. We begin to develop a microlevel model of organization-level relations that accounts for nodal multiplexity. In data on baseball player trades, we found that individual leaders' ties affected exchanges less than did an organization's other ties. The sharing of exchange experiences by organizations and their current leaders increased the influences of those experiences on exchange behavior. Thus, leaders have more influence within their organizational contexts than in isolation.
Details
Academic Journal
Management

“Disrupting the Chain of Displaced Aggression: A Review and Agenda for Future Research”

Displaced aggression refers to instances in which a person redirects their harm-doing behavior from a primary to a substitute, secondary target. Since the publication of the first empirical article in 1948, there has been a noticeable surge in research referencing this theory in both management and psychology journals. This trend highlights the continuing relevance of displaced aggression research and its applicability to other disciplinary fields (e.g., criminology, hospitality management, information systems, tourism). Despite the ubiquity of displaced aggression theory, however, there persists a notable lack of clarity and consensus regarding its fundamental principles, triggering factors, and underlying mechanisms. In light of these limitations, we provide a systematic and interdisciplinary review of displaced aggression theory with three key aims. First, our review offers foundational knowledge that helps unify the diverse ways in which scholars from varied disciplinary backgrounds have applied, interpreted, and operationalized displaced aggression. Second, inspired by the I3 Model, we introduce an overarching theoretical framework to coherently and parsimoniously organize the displaced aggression literature. Lastly, to move the field forward, we propose a promising agenda for future research that focuses on important issues emerging from our review.
Details
Academic Journal
Finance

“Dividend policy and investment: Theory and evidence from US panel data”

This paper examines the importance of dividend policy and liquidity constraints in the context of the firm's investment behaviour. While early financial literature has argued that dividend policy should be independent of firm investment decisions, recent studies indicate that linkages are probable in a world of imperfect capital markets. This study develops an alternative Q specification which incorporates the actual dividend payment of the firm in order to test the hypothesis of independence. Empirical results suggest that after controlling for the firm's dividend payment, liquidity constraints remain an important determinant of firm investment behavior.
Details
Conference
BIS

“Do Measures of Security Compliance Intent Equal Non-Compliance Scenario Agreement?”

To better protect organizations from the threat of insiders, IS security (ISS) research frequently emphasizes IS Security Policy (ISP) behavior. The effectiveness of an assessment model is typically analyzed either using short survey statements (behavior survey) or by using scenario agreement (prospective scenario) to measure current and prospective compliance (or non-compliance) behavior. However, a significant gap is the lack of statistical evidence to demonstrate that these two measures or dependent variables (DV) sufficiently agree with one another. We report on an effort to compare and contrast two assessment models which employed alternate styles of DVs and demonstrate that the primary construct from two different ISS behavioral theories had approximately the same effect size on either of the DVs. Our findings add support for substantial (but not overly correlated) synchronization between the two DV values, since we also observe that the prospective scenario non-compliance measure resulted in lower model fit while the behavior survey compliance measures fit both models with higher accuracy. We discuss our findings and recommend that for many studies there can be value in employing both DVs.
Details