Faculty Research

Search Publications

Recent Journal Publications by COB Faculty

Search Publications

Filter & Sort Results: 1294
[clear]
Publication Type Publication Type
Discipline Discipline
Year Published Year Published

Sort by

Showing results for: ""
Results:
Academic Journal
Management

“Is there a dark side of Big Data – point, counterpoint”

Haakonsson and Carroll see two sides to Big Data. In his executive experience, Haakansson finds big data slows the decision making process and the implementation of decisions as well. Executives tend to wait for more data just because it is there. Is there a solution? Haakonsson argues that leadership based upon experience and courage is needed. Carroll sees a different world where we have continually improved tools which can automate the analyses of big data and give us answers quickly. That is, big data is not a problem, but a solution for executives. But there is also a problem; what are the right questions to ask? Without hypotheses, the questions are endless. Leaders must utilize their experience, intuition and insights to ask the right questions – not all the possible questions which big data can address. Is there a synthesis? Big data by itself is not necessarily a good thing; but it can be if leaders have the courage to move on in a timely manner where they ask the right questions – not all the questions possible that big data can address.
Full Details
Full Details
Academic Journal
Management

“Is time the great equalizer? How interpersonal time request processes are shaped by and reproduce disparities”

The pace of work and implications of the global pandemic have heightened many employees’ awareness of the demands on their time, especially demands through interpersonal requests from coworkers. However, little research has examined how interactions involving requests for time—a scarce and valuable resource that influences the generation and consumption of economic and psychological resources—unfold and their implications for individuals and collective climates at work. We work toward a theory that expands and sharpens knowledge of interpersonal time requests—processes of generating, making, interpreting, and responding to requests for time. Integrating perspectives on status, interpersonal interaction, and diversity, we develop a multilevel theory for how status disparity shapes intrapersonal cognition and interpersonal interactions during time requests, and tax employees’ time and other resources regressively. Our theorizing advances understanding of how the joint form of achieved status (i.e., status derived from task-based expertise) and ascribed status (i.e., status derived from demographics) shapes interpersonal interactions between time request initiators and responders, thereby illuminating how and why episodic, dyadic, and collective disparities can emerge in ways that can be costly and dysfunctional to organizations. We conclude by outlining how our theorizing can enable future research and inform practice.
Full Details
Full Details
Academic Journal
Marketing

“Isolation in Globalizing Academic Fields: A Collaborative Autoethnography of Early Career Researchers”

This study examines academic isolation – an involuntary perceived separation from the academic field to which one aspires to belong, associated with a perceived lack of agency in terms of one’s engagement with the field – as a key challenge for researchers in increasingly globalized academic careers. While prior research describes early career researchers’ isolation in their institutions, we theorize early career researchers’ isolation in their academic fields and reveal how they attempt to mitigate isolation to improve their career prospects. Using a collaborative autoethnographic approach, we generate and analyze a dataset focused on the experiences of ten early career researchers in a globalizing business academic field known as Consumer Culture Theory. We identify bricolage practices, polycentric governance practices, and integration mechanisms that work to enhance early career researchers’ perceptions of agency and consequently mitigate their academic isolation. Our findings extend discussions on isolation and its role in new academic careers. Early career researchers, in particular, can benefit from a deeper understanding of practices that can enable them to mitigate isolation and reclaim agency as they engage with global academic fields.
Full Details
Full Details
Academic Journal
BIS

“IT Artifact Bias: How exogenous predilections influence organizational information system paradigms”

Efforts in IS research have long sought to bridge the gap between the information technology (IT) function and strategic business interests. Efforts in IS research have long sought to bridge the gap between the information technology (IT) function and the strategic business interests. People perceive affordances (possibilities for action) in information technology artifacts differently as cognitive structures (schema) which bias individual focus. This study explores how an individual’s tendency to perceive the ‘trees’ in an IT ‘forest’ (artifact preference), affects their assessment of efforts to achieve more effective IT outcomes. The effect is demonstrated using a relatively simple IT success model. Further, in a sample of 120 survey responses supported by ten semi-structured interviews we demonstrate that job role and organizational IT complexity systematically impact artifact perception. A better understanding of IT artifact bias promises to help organizations better assess information systems.
Full Details
Full Details